Your point regarding Infrared Light is well taken, however, there was no evidence for IR in the 1600′s nor any reason to believe it existed. In that context it differs from the LOA in that proponents advocate it’s use, despite any evidence for its existence or quantifiable results.

The real test is not that there is an abundance of advocates seeking monetary gain, selling products based on their sales pitch that it works, but rather someone proving it works (i.e. manifest a suitcase filled with money – or to make it easier, manifest a single dollar bill to prove it exists, can be used to one’s benefit and works).

I would like to believe, however, all I see are advocates out for personal gain, no evidence it exists or works and known, well documented natural laws that, as understood today, deny its existence.

Will an advocate step forward to prove it??

While your point is valid that the LOA isn’t testable or provable, one wonders if that’s simply because we do not presently have the technology to understand it, apply it consistently, and test it. If someone proposed the idea of infrared light in the 1600′s they probably would have been labeled a witch or an idiot. But infrared light existed – there was simply no way at the time to measure it. Your point about the electromagnetic impulses of a thought may be correct, but is it possible that there is some other type of energy involved in connecting with the “Universe”?

Interesting reading and great collection of works on your site… I’ll be back, and I’m looking forward to reading more of your blog entries.

Thanks also for the video of the blind kid.